A World Gone Mad!

Parents must control their kids.................

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/3766074/Sun-visits-riot-torn-Tottenham.html

I have admired Shaun Bailey for some time, this softly spoken guy comes with a raft of common-sense! Davey
(Read more about him by clicking on this blogs title above)http://daveyonefamilylawman.blogspot.com/2009/10/education-education-education.html



'Paedos' Charter........................?
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3766244/Paedos-charter-lets-them-see-kids.html
In this instance the child's human rights should be paramount, and we should all act in their best interest to protect them!
These Paedo's should forfeit any rights the minuet they impose their will on a child!

Attorney- General, selective justice!
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm110706/debtext/110706-0003.htm
I have contacted the Attorney- General and ask him to consider the injustice I have incurred over the past 7 years but once again he has deferred this to the Ministry of Justice. I had hoped he would also consider the plight of Dave Hawksworth as he seems more interested in high profile cases as with the support he offered to Chris Jefferey's who appeared to face trial by media last December over the Jo Yeates murder in the city at Christmas.

To this end I call on the BBC to broadcast a special edition to coincide with the forthcoming Family Justice review due for publication this autumn. I would hope to see contributions not only from the Reviews chairman, David Norgrove but also Shaun Bailey, John Hemming MP, Lynne Featherstone MP. Camilla Cavendish Times journalist, Iain Duncan Smith DWP minister, Lord Justice Ward, Ken Clarke,Jack Straw and London Mayor Boris Johnson, Even Sir Bob;
together they could hold the key to solving this burning issue!

What hope I ask when our eminent Law Lord complains of injustice himself in The Times on 1st May 2008 and again in Bristol in 2009 yet as a law maker surely he has the power to fix it?
The ineffectual Lord Justice Falconer did nothing to advance the reform of family justice, Jack Straw did not enforce his open court policy for fear he may offend the very judges that needed scrutiny, and Ken Clarke who was seen napping during the PM's speech following the riots still remains oblivious to the problem.

I truly hope the publication of the forthcoming review does not prove to be the fudge many of us are expecting!

Family Justice Review:dea​dline 23rd June 2011: Summery!

Dear Mr. Norgrove,
I wonder if just a few months is enough to fully consider all the facts relating to this enormous subject,I feel it is such a mammoth task more time may be required and I offer you all my research gleaned over the past 7 years and 3 years of publishing my findings from first hand experiences as well as other people's testimonies.
http://world4justice.wordpress.com/

The misgivings I have uncovered in the family law system not only here in the UK but across the world has ramifications most especially on our young, their families and society as a whole and I hope the endeavours of your review will see it as a matter of urgency that these injustices are addressed and not some cost cutting expediency for this coalition Government. ( I apologise for my cynicism but years at the wrong end of family law will do that to a man!) Many of my contemporaries consider this could just be a fudge or whitewash but after completing the very detailed questionnaires last September feel this review should be given a chance and I was gratified for the final question which read 'what question should we have asked if you feel something has been missed?' to which I replied that I hoped you will consider the number of suicides that take place each year ( In Australia where records are kept 16,000 people have taken their lives through Family Court failure and CSA intimidation since November 2007 ) I would suggest in the UK and Canada the totals are probably double that in the USA it runs into 100,000's where the correlation between returning service personnel who then have to face broken relationships at home is just to much for one man to bear!!

Legal Professionals: There is great incentive for Solicitors and indeed Barristers rather then seek conciliation to cause still further agitation in sensitive matters as they can then make the most of the legal aid budget or rendering a parent, most often the father, bankrupt, all under the watchful scrutiny, of the Judge but of course all behind the secret family court. There is now a call for these judges to be scrutinised and courts to be opened up using the same safeguards as in criminal courts (Child A etc). I know you commended the work of theses so called professionals in your early considerations, but please look again as there is a darker side to this industry then I believe you are aware.
Grandparents: Once again I was dismayed by your early findings which much maline Grandparents.The role of the Grandparents is vital and I believe holds the key to fundamental reform of our failing Family Court system. Why is there such widespread Social Services or CAFCASS intervention in hitherto normal families? Surely if parents are experiencing difficulties the priority in the child's true best interest (not necessary the same as the court mantra wheeled out time and again.) is to keep the children within family care and Grandparents or extended family seems a more prudent and beneficial way to offer children stability then to rely on spurious snap shot reports from strangers which weak judges rely upon for their judgements.Grandparents should be equally responsible as parents in such cases and the law should reflect this.

Police: The Police have no real role in Family law proceedings and will admit as much , they are unable to enforce a court order on a mother who withholds her children in spite of dad standing there with his court orders waving over his head Chamberlain style ( and as much worth as the letter the war time leader was holding then) The Police unable to act will caution such a father that he could be arrested for breaching the peace and should return matters to court, but what for if the court order he has is not worth the paper it is written on?

CAFCASS: In my view should be disbanded as they have become lackeys or scapegoats for judges who can point to their reports when things go wrong, as they all too often do. Rather then rely on Social Services at all the courts should have access to previous family history records from a family doctor, so false allegations that emerge at these sensitive times can swiftly be quashed!


CSA : Should also in my opinion be disbanded as not only has it failed for over 20 years the tactics they employ are little more the draconian which I have likened to Gestapo and KGB as there is no accountability for their Sex discrimination Race discrimination or their breaches of human rights. Financial matters should be settled at court as part of the summing up process and in conjunction with contact and PR agreements.

I hope the Family Justice Review has recognised Parental Alienation which most often happens when the so called resident parents stops the so called absent parent (new name required here) is stopped from enjoying contact with his children ( More often Fathers but on occasion Mothers ) it should be outlawed as the psychological child abuse it is when a parent uses their own children as ransom to attain more money from a father or the system as she will show she is sole parent in spite of court orders to the contrary. Once again something the CSA will accept without the need to purse all the facts!

False allegations of abuse or violence should be dealt with as robustly as the genuine cases they undermine, and again Family GP records should be admissible to court or at least to the judge when it is clear there were no incidents before one parent wants to earn more kudos in this arena.

The solution I have arrived at for sometime and by coincidence a fellow campaigner did in Canada is to make legal aid available to both parties at the outset and one court appearance to be included in that cost. This will then focus minds on both parents doing the right thing for their children including contact arrangements and financial matters there after if a party wishes to return matters to court it has to be at their own expense and only refundable if proven that the alternative parent has not acted appropriately and stiff penalties for either parent who fails to adhere to the letter and spirit of the court order. This should mean no requirement for CAFCASS, SS or CSA intervention as long as the orders until the children reach secondary school age (12) can be enforced.

Family Courts should be opened to press and public scrutiney with the same safeguards in place for sensitive criminal cases but it is the Judges who we need to scrutinised. Once and for all recognise the biased and bigotry that exists in this industry and there should be law that makes both parents equal and responsible for their children in to adult hood. Mothers do not always know best and childhood is such a short span of time, lets get it right in their true best interest!
I rest my case!

( View davey's campaigning site by clicking on this blogs title above)

Family Justice Review deadline 23rd June 2011: Social Services

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1391443/Baby-P-boss-Sharon-Shoesmith-set-1-million-payout.html
Why is so much faith put in Social Services when children are involved in Family Court as when it all goes wrong all they have to do is role out that same old mantra " We will learn from this and move on !" well they do move on but rarely learn from it and even get compensated when they themselves get it wrong, and they in turn act as scapegoats for failing family court judges who can then sight their inaccurate reports as to why they made their (all too often irreversible) judgements!

I wonder why Social Services are called upon to report on fairly mild cases in family law. If there were previous cases of violence or abuse this would be on record as a matter of fact and once again why is it most often assumed it is Dad who is the abuser? In the 7 years I have been researching this subject I have found more women abuse then men and all to often it is the hidden abuse of psychology that a mother will use to 'persude' a child to act in such a way when even a relatively young child knows it to be wrong, but fears going against the resident parent as he/she has to live with that parent daily. The cruelest of abuse is Parental Alienation something Social Services doesn't even recognise yet whilst it allows a vindictive parent to use a child like a tool or even a weapon and at the worst extreme for ransom it is left to the non resident parent to anticipate the regret those children will feel in later life,those lost years in the relatively short span of time that is childhood that can never be replaced.


I believe Courts should have access to past medial records from the family doctor as this would quickly show up the false allegations that arise in family court so one parent may take advantage over another false allegations should also be dealt with as a crime and severe action including prison should be imposed even if it means taking the mother away from the children , she may then realise she is not serving her kids best interest by lying!

What chance have were mere lay people in this corrupted industry, when even those at the head of legal departments in Social Services fail to serve the children's best interest as that of this Council Leader

(Click on blog title to read more on this!)

Family Justice Review deadline 23rd June 2011: Family Court.

When I first entered family Court in March 2004 the presiding judge on the day His Honour judge Hayward-Smith. I wondered what all the fuss was about as I found a judge here who told the opposing Barrister to ".. sit down as it seemed clear to him that in this case it was the father who was seeking to offer stability and maintain a Status Quo for his children in spite of separation!"
It took another 7 months however to attain that status quo in the form of a court order that spelled out in clear terms that having been granted Parental responsibility (a given to all parents on birth certificates since then) both parents should enjoy a joint residency order, shared care agreement and 50/50 access to both children what could be more in the children's best interest then equal access to both parents living in close proximity to each other and equal distance to the schools, certainly till both children were of a mature age, probably at secondary school (present day) to make their own minds up as to which parent to visit on particular days and not so rigid as this order designed to offer routine and stability in their former years. His Honour Judge Vilgeon (who reminded me a little of Leo J Carroll who stared as Mr Waverly in Man from Uncle) summed up the day with what he described as fatherly advice that it was now incumbent on both of us to make this order work, something I was swift to embrace whilst the mother was determined to undermine it form day one in March to that day, 20th October 2004 when she set about unravelling this hard fought for order in the best interest ( I had hoped ) for our children!

From that date to present day the mother, with the aid of a particularly biased judge in the form of Her honour Judge Pearl , unravelled all that work with such insistence that contact, which had been via school collection and return time so as to avoid conflict, now become adjacent to the former family home which was sure to cause conflict. It was like this judge and the so called impartial CAFCASS reporter had become my ex partners own special advisers and whilst I struggled to keep up to her demands as well as legal bill I found the hoops they expected be to jump through became smaller and smaller till it was impossible!
Today in spite of that original order that remains in place the mother has withheld my children for 45 months with impunity and from the perspective of HHJ Pearl actively condoned her Parental Alienation which extends to the extended family, school, doctors police and anyone else who becomes involved, whilst all the time it was meant to offer the children, who I believe most right minded people would agree, stability structure and as near normal family life in their best interest.

I tried to take matters to a further court to have this systematic destruction stopped but it was clear from the out set one judge would not over-rule another, yet this is exactly what Pearl did to Vilgeon and there is no mechanism available to enforce the order on the mother yet when I turned up for contact at the prescribed time and place with my order waved above my head almost Chamberlain style, as with the war time Prime Minister it was not worth the paper it was written on and in fact I was nearly arrested for breach of the peace when it was her not adhering to the letter and principle of what HHJ Vilgeon had offered in 2004.


The advice from the ill informed police was to return matters to court as they saw it as a civil matter as far as the mother was concerned, yet they were quick to try to make Dad a criminal as they can administer this easier themselves.
So my question to Lord Justice Ward and his cronies who bleat on about;
"Vengeful mothers leave good fathers powerless to see child," says judge
who is it but these failing law makers who are expected to put this right and in these times of supposed equality why can't Family Court orders be enforced on both parent rather then just dads? It is time the secrecy that hides the corruption and biased bigotry in these courts be exposed as in any other walk of life they would be regarded as sex discrimination, race discrimination and a breach of fundamental human rights especially against the children who's voices are never heard, yet these hypocrites claim to serve their best interest. If this is the case open the courts to public scrutiny as with criminal courts and in especially sensitive cases the media instructed to describe them as Child A, Child B, Family XYZ or use a press Id code relating to a specific Court orders otherwise this system along with it's accomplices in the form of CSA ,CAFCASS, Social Services and the money greedy legal professionals will continue to act like latter day gestapo of KGB with impunity!

What could be more appropriate for a Father but to defend those he holds most dear? His Children!

Family Justice review: Deadline 23rd June 2011 : CAFCASS

CAFCASS (click blog title for more) is in effect court appointed social workers who are instructed to make a snap-shot of your family then make a report with far reaching and long term consequences for your family who may never recover from in a life time.

Although I only had limited contact with this erroneous organisation, I was given the heads up by my McKenzie friend, the late Ian Mackay, spokesperson for Families need Fathers who pointed out that my 'impartial' court reporter, who at my final hearing that lasted from 9:00 am to 4:00pm spent 90% of the time with my ex-partner, had herself an ex-partner who was part of the FNF org. How was her judgement ever going to be balanced, when the main reason being that my barrister was keen to cross examine her?


CAFCASS has become the lackey of poor judges who can point at their reports as an excuse for making the wrong , and all too often irreversible judgements. CAFCASS has become the scapegoat for an already failing system and allows false allegations to have credence in these secret and sinister court rooms.As all that is required by them is to present the required report to expatiate matters swiftly to the judges liking which is more often then not far from just!
All too often they pander to feckless runaway dads who have little regard for their kids and self serving money grabbing mothers who want their own 'rewards' that the children rarely see the benefit of . Meanwhile Good loving Dads are being alienated from their children and undemanding and caring mother are not getting all they are entitled to in support of their children.

"Since the high profile cases such as Baby Peter, Victoria Climbe, and Khyra Ishaq social services have been keen to cover their backs and avoid the chastisement they face when things go wrong and they pretend to learn from it and move on , the trouble is they do not learn, they remain incompetent and out of their depth and as a result great swaths of innocent families are being caught up in their net of lies a deceit"Davey

http://daveyonefamilylawman.blogspot.com/2009_11_01_archive.html

Family Justice Review : Deadline 23rd June 2011:Grandparents4Justice!

I was touched this week by 2 articles in the June edition of Mature Times; Grandparents new heartache and Have we lost our Grandson forever? (Click blog title for more on this) I would implore David Norgrove as Chair of the Family Justice Review to rethink his interim view on the grandparents role in the family and on society as a whole. These bastions of commonsense and stability could be the answer to the whole Family Law issue in the UK and beyond,where feasible would it not be better for a grandparernt to care for their own children’s kids as opposed to social services in times of crisis? Even as the cynic in me believes the whole review is purely a cost cutting exercise rather then a true pursuit of justice, so here is a cheaper and morally better alternative!
Parental Alienation is also a force that undermines families and is not simply restricted to children and their dad but extended famly including grandparents and uncles & Aunties, and where the authorities are concerned all too often favor the parent who holds the children whilst ignoring the family stopped from having contact or access.
Presenter Gloria Hunniford has campaigned on this issues and Radio personality James Whale watched his own son be alienated from his granddaughter at the time he himself was diagnosed with cancer and to which he dedicated a whole chapter of his book ( Chapter 11 I believe)
http://www.parents4protest.co.uk/p4p/grandparents_group.htm



I would not advocate our silver surfer’s climbing up something dressed as Spiderman, but aren’t they the true superheros anyway?

Justice in June!

In a world where an increasing number of feckless men father babies they then wifully abandon Rob Daley was a child ever child wants! So said Jane Moore as tribute to the father of Tom ,Olympic gold medalist.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3607796/Olympic-star-Tom-Daley-mourns-his-dad-Rob.html

But, and I know it is a very big but, what about the self-serving women who choose to have babies when they know the world is already over populated solely for their own financial gains even alienatining loving dads to enhance their prospect from a system that actively condones such practice!

At a time when Kerry Katona is awarded £1.66 in child maintance how come a lowly paid dustman is expected to lose half his salary each month in child maintence when he was already sent bankrupt by trying to do what he considered best forhis kids including offering a second family home equal distance to the schools as the one they share with their mother which now happens to be mortage free!

(Click on this blogs title for more from The Sun)

The £35,000 Joint residency order, shared care aggrement and even equal contact with both parents could so easily be unravelled (quite how or why that was in the children's best interest is anyone guess) and on top of which the CSA do not take any of that into considersation when they pluck a figure from the sky and insist you pay regardless of ability or means... or the fact you have already paid and paid again!!
So as I set off for Plymouth lets ponder those thoughts!

Daveyone...Man...Dad....(Father's Month)...Protest

Let my one man crusade focus the world's attention on Family Court, Child Welfare and Parental Alienation Injustice and keep the media busy this June!

CSA

First on my must do list in June is to pay a visit to this erronious organisation and would ask you to send your CSA stories to http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/contact.html where I will be making a very personal appeal not to persecute loving Dads including ME!
Australian Child Support Agency death toll since
Kevin Rudd became Prime Minister: 15348 clients

It does not look like it will reduce anytime soon now Julia Gillard is at the helmbut I wonder what the totals are in USA, Canada , New Zealand and indeed here in the UK?

Ministry of Justice: Family Justice Review! familyjusticereview@justice.gsi.gov.uk

There are 3 dates in the UK whereby you can still make a presentaion of your case for the review to consider this Autumn but you will nned to be quick;

Cardiff: Tuesday 31st May ( approximately 2pm to 4pm)

Manchester: Wednesday 1st June (approximately 2pm to 4pm)

Birmingham: Tuesday 7th June (approximately 2pm to 4pm)

You need to register your interest in attending at; http://www.blogger.com/partners@justice.gsi.gov.uk and I will be requesting a further consultation in person oppertunity for the North -East and London, which I hope will be between 19th June ( Father's day) and 23rd June deadline for submissions to this review further details click on this blogs title or contact here;

Family Justice Review Secretariat

4.23 Ministry of Justice

102 Petty France

London

SW1H 9AJ

T 44+ 020 3334 420

http://www.justice.gov.uk/

Family Court.

It all went wrong for me at Watford or I should say a court order designed with my children's best interest at heart was sanctioned by one judge by systematically unravelled by another proving such orders are not worth the paper they are written on and can only be enforced on Dad, but not Mum, so I will remind them of this when I arrive in Watford. You may like to notify your story to the local press in Watford in anticipation of my visit (See the social services link below)

CAFCASS.

It is my intention to bring a focus on this organisation, which is little more then a poor judges scapegoat, who they can point a finger to when they inevertably go wrong I will be calling for their demise when I arrive in Luton next month.

Social Services.

I will be paying a visit to Hertford County Council this coming months so look out for oppertunities to contact the media on such topics via my Facebook page by the same title as this blog.
http://daveyonefamilylawman.blogspot.com/2011/04/ex-herts-county-council-legal-chief.html

Daveyone says;
No!!
More Injustice + Enough is Enough
JUSTICE4CHILDREN
Family Law and Child Welfare Reform
http://www.daveyonefamilylawman.blogspot.com/