The Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP, serves as our Attorney-General, and who, I am told, will not consider individual cases, so whilst he saw fit to intervene in the case of Chris Jefferies who appeared to be 'Tried by media' over the Jo Yeate's murder in Bristol last Christmas, he fails to see the merit of asking why so many dads are going to prison simply for being a DAD!
The Rt Hon Iain Duncan-Smith MP has shown some pragmatic thinking when it comes to our family values in the modern age, yet he is still content to preside over an organisation (CSA) with in his DWP remit that goes beyond normal conventions of recognised law and are prepared to act in a way akin to the former KGB and Gestapo in their tactics!
The Rt. Hon Michael Gove MP who, as Children's Minister, was prepared to speak on behalf of the Home Secretary in the wake of the recent riots in England last month with his characteristic robust manner, although he still seems more then content to maintain the Status Quo established by the last Government over children's services and our failing social services.
The one thing his predecessor, Ed Balls MP, got right during his tenure in this office was to sack a failing Children's services director for her negligence.
So why has the latest incumbent failed to overrule a subsequent ruling that allows that self same director from being compensated up to £1 million for losing her Job? http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16001310
Lord Justice Ward complained in The Times on 1st May 2008 that; Vengeful mothers leave good fathers powerless to see child, says judge he then refers to a similar case in Bristol in December 2009
If he as own of our law makers from the Upper house is unable, or is it unwilling to put this law right who does he expect will? Lord Justice's Ward, Wall and Woolf should also seek to disband the appalling CAFCASS too whilst they are at it!
So what of the so called legal professionals? Barristers and Solicitors who are content to plunder the legal aid purse for Mum whilst rendering Dad bankrupt. Just how is this serving the best interest of the children? History tells us that Adolf Hitler came up with the slogan of In the best interest of the children knowing everyone will follow in the belief it was true, in family court it most certainly is NOT!
Should we really put so much faith in this one Civil Servant?